[ad_1]
From Jennifer Marohasy’s Weblog
Jennifer Marohasy
Black is white, sizzling is chilly. That’s what we’re frequently being requested to imagine, together with by the counsel for Michael Mann in his defamation trial once more Mark Steyn.
In case you haven’t already began listening alongside, I recommend you start with the re-enactments within the each day Ann and Phelim podcasts. I’ve simply completed listening to Day 5, Mann within the Field. And I’m offended.
I’m offended that data might be so misrepresented, and I’m additionally offended that for therefore a few years John Abbot and I’ve not been correctly supported in our battle for the parallel knowledge to allow some checking of the final thirty years of thermometer temperature knowledge for Australia.
In case you take heed to Day 5, Mann within the Field, you’ll hear Ann McElinney incredulous that local weather scientists might imagine tree ring knowledge from 1134 AD, however not 1980 (I may need bought these years incorrect). Thus, the necessity to ‘conceal the decline’ and for ‘Mike’s trick’, which is swapping to thermometer knowledge from proxy (tree ring) knowledge as handy, which is routinely carried out by local weather scientists as detailed within the Climategate emails.
As Ann explains, from Michael Mann’s personal phrases, the notorious hockey stick graph that created a lot impetus for motion on local weather change, is reliant on tree ring knowledge which might be assumed to be dependable again some centuries however are recognized to not be dependable because the Eighties – it is unnecessary.
Welcome to the world of local weather science the place sizzling is chilly and black is white. And extra particularly to my world the place I’ve been attempting to attract consideration to the truth that the temperature knowledge for Australia, and far of the remainder of the world, shouldn’t be dependable for at the least the final thirty years. I’ve proven this by my weblog sequence, Hyping Most Each day Temperatures (Components 1- 7).
Particularly, that the change over to computerized climate stations the place temperature is more and more measured as electrical resistance by platinum resistance probes which might be prone to electrical interference notably at airports, and that may be calibrated to measure how ever many levels hotter (or cooler) that Andrew Johnston, the present head of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, would possibly deem applicable.
I’ve been assured over the previous couple of years, together with by Andrew Johnson, that the change from mercury thermometer to platinum resistance probe shouldn’t be the reason for, nor a contribution to, world warming as reported on the nightly tv information. If it was, this is able to be evident as a rise within the variety of sizzling days and their common temperature – simply the identical as what we’re advised has been attributable to rising ranges of atmospheric carbon dioxide.
They deal with us like mugs (by which I imply idiots or lazy geese in a park), and for essentially the most half my colleagues behave as such. Thank goodness for Mark Steyn. Lastly, somebody who calls black for black – besides when he’s joking.
Essentially the most simple method to know the impact of the change to temperature probes – and to differentiate this from the potential results of warming from carbon dioxide – can be to match the automated readings from the probes with the handbook readings from mercury thermometers at many climate stations over a few years.
The bureau has been amassing this knowledge as handwritten recordings on A8 types. There isn’t a official checklist however, piecing collectively data, I’m assured that parallel knowledge – measurements from probes versus mercury – exists for 38 climate stations and from many of those there needs to be greater than 20 years of each day knowledge accessible to allow comparisons. Entry to all this data, and its evaluation, would allow some evaluation of the consequence of the tools change. The problem is doubly difficult by the bureau utilizing multiple sort of probe, altering the kind of probe used, and the kind of knowledge transmitted electronically – initially averaging values after which altering to the recording of instantaneous values.
It was again in 2015 that I first tried get the parallel knowledge for Wilson’s Promontory Lighthouse. (You’ll be able to learn the letter I first despatched to the Bureau by CLICKING HERE, and an summary of the saga by CLICKING HERE.)
Then in December 2017, after John Abbot advised me that I had been going about all of it incorrect, I challenged him to get the information for me. Thus started his try and get this knowledge by Freedom of Data (FOI).
After some years, and a lot correspondence and denial, relatively than hand over the temperature knowledge to John Abbot, we ended up on the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) with me because the knowledgeable witness and him representing himself. That was in February final yr, practically a yr in the past. Besides that trial by no means proceeded, for causes I nonetheless don’t perceive besides that Andrew Johnson doesn’t need Boris Kelly-Gerreryn to have to offer proof underneath oath, for causes that I do perceive.
So, we have been compelled again into mediation. I used to be contacted someday after this by a lawyer involved that we have been representing ourselves. I inspired him to place the phrase out by his community that we should always get some assist, some help preferable from somebody who understood how tough it’s to win on the AAT and a lawyer skilled in the identical. Then I get a telephone name from John Roskam asking about all of this as a result of Stuart Woods had contacted him having seen the notice from this lawyer to the community of Australian legal professionals who ostensibly concern themselves with problems with public curiosity. Sure, I confirmed, it could be good to get some authorized help, and that was the final I heard of it.
John Abbot has although acquired extra correspondence from Boris Kelly-Gerreyn particularly a letter dated December 7, 2023. On this letter, the bureau is again to denying that any of this parallel knowledge exists. Boris Kelly-Gerreyn is the Common Supervisor, Knowledge Program and Chief Knowledge Officer, Bureau of Meteorology.
It’s the case that in local weather science: black is white, and sizzling is chilly and the Conservative facet of politics appears, for essentially the most half, to simply go together with all of this. The planet is boiling and all of that, let’s go nuclear, say the sitting geese. Etcetera. Etcetera.
Associated
[ad_2]
Source link
