Why Does ‘Election Denier’ Apply Solely to 2020?

By Mick Mulvaney for RealClearPolitics

There are lots of insights to be gained, classes to be discovered, and tales to be informed in regards to the 2022 midterm elections. One, nonetheless, has not a single factor to do with any candidate or coverage. It has to do with phrases.

Everyone knows that phrases matter. For this reason in any dialogue, management of the language is vital. Thus, as an alternative of speaking about abortion, we speak by way of “alternative” and “life,” and we now have “local weather change” as an alternative of “international warming.”

RELATED: Hypocrites: A Record of Democrats Who Denied The 2000, 2004, and 2016 Presidential Election Outcomes

Such was the case in the course of the midterms. Two phrases have been centrally featured within the runup to the election, all through the day itself, proper via to the post-mortems:  “election denier.”

In the event you watched any protection of election day, you heard that time period repeatedly. It turned a synonym for crackpot, right-wing, mega-MAGA candidates. The media fell over themselves highlighting simply what number of of those crazies have been working on GOP tickets. CBS Information set the quantity at 308; the Washington Submit claimed 291; the New York Occasions, apparently much less diligent of their analysis, may solely discover “greater than” 220. (The Brookings Institute claimed there have been as many as 345 of those deviants on the poll.)

With an expansion like that, it’d lead one to marvel: what precisely is an election denier? Whereas a good query, that is oftentimes the toughest a part of any investigation into language. What a phrase means, it appears, is commonly subjective. Simply as usually, it’s unclear on goal, as shut scrutiny would possibly undermine its worth.

So, it was considerably shocking to see that a minimum of one media outlet really had the honesty to outline, on election evening, what it meant by the time period. Per CBS Information, it means exactly this:

1) Saying the 2020 election was stolen

2) Repeating disproven claims relating to voter fraud in 2020

3) Supporting an audit of the 2020 election

4) Signing onto the Texas lawsuit relating to the 2020 election

5) Objecting to the certification of the Electoral Faculty ends in 2020, or

6) Being “unclear” as as to whether Biden was legitimately elected in 2020

RELATED: Bush and Obama Coincidentally Holding ‘Disinformation Conferences’ Following Trump’s Anticipated 2024 Announcement

The attorneys studying this can know that the “or” on the finish implies that you solely want to fulfill a kind of standards to fulfill the check. So, one remark that the election was stolen, and you might be an “election denier.”  And CBS, once more to their credit score, confirmed that on-air.

The repetition of the limiting “in 2020” or “Biden” can also be instructive. We’ve had elections for a very long time, it appears. Fairly commonly, in reality. And after we are coping with one thing as elementary to the functioning of our Republic as questioning the end result of the democratic course of, there doesn’t appear to be a great cause to restrict these elements to only the final 24 months.

Apparently, if that “within the 2020 election” goes away, the record of culprits modifications dramatically. With the limitation, you seize such towering nationwide figures as Mark Fincham and Kristina Karamo. However when you drop it, the record of loopy misfits appears to be like much more acquainted:

Barack Obama. Jimmy Carter. Invoice Clinton. Joe Biden. Hillary Clinton. Kamala Harris. Bernie Sanders. Jesse Jackson. Nancy Pelosi. Ted Kennedy. Harry Reid. Dianne Feinstein. Sherrod Brown. Dick Durbin. Debbie Stabenow. Cory Booker. John Lewis. Jerry Nadler. Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Alcee Hastings. Lacy Clay. Marcia Fudge. Ted Lieu. Maxine Waters. Jamie Raskin. Raúl Grijalva. Sheila Jackson Lee. Terry McAuliffe. Howard Dean. Stacey Abrams.

Making use of the CBS standards to elections apart from 2020, all of them, each single one, is an election denier. Certainly, a few of them, a number of instances over. President Carter appeared to make a passion of it, questioning the legitimacy of the 2000, 2004, and 2016 elections. Or, extra concisely, each Republican presidential victory this century.

RELATED: The Media Had a Whole Meltdown Over Trump’s 2024 Announcement – Take a look at These Unhinged Headlines

Which, after all, is most of what this whole “election denier” mania is all about: discovering yet one more solution to undermine Republican candidates for public workplace. Certainly, one is left to marvel if the media shouldn’t simply drop the façade of claiming there are too many election deniers on the GOP ticket, and simply get to the guts of their grievance: there are too many Republicans on the Republican ticket.

Jan. 6 was a travesty, and the Republican Get together shall be working for years to undo the harm it did to this nation, and to take away that stain by itself popularity. And with out query, unsubstantiated and debunked claims of a stolen election contributed on to what occurred that day. However to say that one occasion, and one occasion alone, is chargeable for the undermining of confidence within the integrity of elections, is to revise historical past. And to abuse the language.

Sooner or later we might begin to acknowledge that each events are accountable in some measure for the challenges we face in our polity. And in some unspecified time in the future we’d start to handle these challenges. However we received’t have the ability to try this if we can’t even agree on what phrases imply.

Syndicated with permission from RealClearWire.

Mick Mulvaney is a former member of Congress, director of the Workplace of Administration and Price range, and White Home chief of workers. He’s presently the co-chair of Actum, a worldwide consultancy. 

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content material companions are their very own and don’t essentially replicate the views of The Political Insider.