[ad_1]
An intellectually confused column within the Oz is unwilling or unable to have interaction with the altering demographics of recent Australia.
![(Image: Gorkie/Private Media)](https://www.crikey.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/18-11-22-Gorkie-for-Crikey-Liberal-single-women.jpg?w=740)
As a one-time “promiscuously” educated younger lady who’s now an “older and wiser”, married, home-owning mom of two, I instantly discover myself of nice curiosity to the Liberal Celebration, specifically the pinnacle of its aligned suppose tank, the Menzies Analysis Centre. The Australian columnist Nick Cater and I aren’t recognized to one another, however I nonetheless really feel uniquely certified to answer his notion that “single younger females” are the most important menace to events on the suitable and that the promised land lies with girls who’ve reached my stage of life.
It could be simple to choose a few of the low-hanging fruit from Cater’s intellectually confused evaluation of the Liberal Celebration’s well-known “lady drawback” and mock it — which many have.
Whether or not it was Cater’s preoccupation with and deeply offensive demonisation of single moms (whats up, the Nineteen Eighties “welfare queen” is again), or his suggestion that younger girls consider the welfare state as some sort of sugar daddy, or his downright bizarre use of sexualised language to characterise the rising development of ladies looking for increased schooling (we should, he says, “deal with the promiscuous entry to increased schooling”), it was exhausting to know the place to start.
Learn extra about the actual terrain of the nation’s panorama.
Already a subscriber? Log in to maintain studying.
Or, register your e mail deal with for a FREE 21-day trial.
[ad_2]
Source link