[ad_1]
[Warning: Potentially Triggering Content]
A pair completely different generations grew up figuring out about this controversy!
Earlier than Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes and The Cardigans, the Romeo and Juliet each eighth grade literature class needed to watch was the 1968 model directed by Franco Zeffirelli. It was an enormous hit that was nominated for 4 Oscars, and for years it was thought-about the movie model of the Shakespeare basic. It helped that for extra verisimilitude, the Italian filmmaker forged precise teenagers to play the titular star-crossed lovers as an alternative of seasoned adults as one would typically see on stage. It makes the play make much more sense with that context. This could all be high-quality have been it not for that one scene…
As these of you who lived by way of their trainer desperately attempting to fast-forward the traditional VHS tape know, after Romeo and Juliet consummate their marriage, they’re proven in mattress the following morning — nude! And also you see for only a second Romeo’s butt and Juliet’s breasts. There’s only a little bit of nudity, however contemplating Leonard Whiting was 16 years outdated on the time and Olivia Hussey was solely 15, it’s fairly sketchy — even for the ’60s.
Images: Kourtney Kardashian & Travis Barker Had A ‘Romeo & Juliet’ Bach Celebration!
It seems the actors are nonetheless fairly upset about all of it these years later! In truth, they are saying it was extra than simply filming them nude — they have been tricked! Per a shock report in Selection on Wednesday, Whiting and Hussey, who’re each of their 70s now, filed a lawsuit late final week in opposition to Paramount for sexual exploitation and distributing nude pictures of adolescent kids. Yeah.
They declare Zeffirelli (who died in 2019) first instructed them they might be sporting flesh-colored underwear to guard their modesty. Then because the scene approached, he begged them to go nude “or the Image would fail.” Nevertheless, they declare, he assured them with the angles of the digicam that their non-public bits wouldn’t be seen. Sadly for lecturers all through the nation, that wasn’t true. Because the pair’s enterprise supervisor Tony Marinozzi put it:
“What they have been instructed and what went on have been two various things. They trusted Franco. At 16, as actors, they took his lead that he wouldn’t violate that belief that they had. Franco was their pal, and admittedly, at 16, what do they do? There aren’t any choices. There was no #MeToo.”
They complain within the go well with how they suffered psychological anguish and emotional misery within the 55 years for the reason that movie embarrassed and betrayed them. Additionally they argue they misplaced out on job alternatives because of the nudity. Lawyer Solomon Gresen defined:
“Nude pictures of minors are illegal and shouldn’t be exhibited. These have been very younger naive kids within the ’60s who had no understanding of what was about to hit them. Rapidly they have been well-known at a degree they by no means anticipated, and as well as they have been violated in a manner they didn’t know cope with.”
In recompense, they’re demanding from Paramount a quantity “believed to be in extra of $500 million.” A HALF BILLION?! Wow.
Innerestingly, a pair years in the past Hussey appeared to have a special view of the scene. She defended it in an interview with Selection in 2018, saying that whereas “no person my age had carried out that earlier than,” it was shot tastefully and “it was wanted for the movie,” explaining:
“It wasn’t that massive of a deal. And Leonard wasn’t shy in any respect! In the course of capturing, I simply utterly forgot I didn’t have garments on.”
What modified? Nicely, there was a short lived suspension of the statute of limitations for claims of kid sexual abuse in California — which ended on December 31, so that they received in proper below the wire.
What do YOU consider the actors’ lawsuit?
[Image via Paramount/YouTube.]
[ad_2]
Source link
